International Day of Women Judges

  AI at the Bench: Legal and Ethical Challenges of Informing – or Misinforming – Judicial Decision-Making Through Generative AI"  OVERVIEW: This paper provides a systematic review of existing AI regulations in Europe, the United States, and in Canada . Based on the analysis, the paper suggests that there are three main regulatory strategies for AI: AI-focused overhauls of existing regulation, the introduction of novel AI regulation, and the omnibus approach.

  In the judiciary system , the women play a very special role. It is not about the equality only, it goes beyond that. In all judiciaries, at national and international courts, judges interpret the law, they decide about others. To be a good judge, it is never sufficient enough to know the law well. In fact, excellent knowledge of the law is an obvious prerequisite for a solid judicial performance . However, we judges should be endowed with something else as well, something that we call a sense for justice, a sense for fairness . We all may define this sense in a slightly different way. Understanding this sense reflects our education, our career and life experience. It also reflects our perspective. It is one of the most important features that brings an essential balance to the judicial decision-making processes .

The United Nations General Assembly declared in a resolution adopted by consensus that March 10th as   International Day of Women Judges . The celebration became an innovative novelty in addition to the International Women’s Day . The United Nations General Assembly Resolution sends a powerful message to the world, to all women judges that their work matters and is irreplaceable, to all male judges that the judiciary, both national and international , is not a male dominated field anymore. It is a message to all young girls and women that women judges are intensely needed to enrich the judicial field with women’s sense for justice and fairness, in addition to the legal knowledge . Women judges and women judicial leaders play an irreplaceable role in modern judiciary.

Judicial decisions impact the most intimate details of everyday life, and they also shape the identity of the judiciary. Judicial decisions thus play a major role in defining the character of a democratic nation and in giving meaning to the rule of law. Thus, the Office of the President of the Supreme Court of Mexico aims to promote jurisprudential practices that uphold the principle of the right to equality. Such an effort requires generating tools that can help jurists to adjudicate cases with a gender perspective. The goal of this Protocol for Judicial Decision-Making with a Gender Perspective is to address and remedy certain problems identified by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights in three recent cases against Mexico: the ‘Cotton Field” Case (Campo Algodonero), the Ines Fernandez Ortega Case, and the Valentina Rosendo Cantú Case. In those cases, the Inter-American Court made clear that Mexican courts must apply, as binding law, the international human rights treaties...